22 N.C. App. 723 - COMMODITIES INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. Eure’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 77B (§ 2 of the Securities Act of 1933)
Relies on Securities & Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co. · Jernigan v. State · Sinva, Inc. v. Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. · McCurnin v. Kohlmeyer & Co. · High Point Surplus Co. v. Pleasants
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]t is well established that ordinarily an injunction will not lie to restrain the enforcement of a statute, since the constitutionality, defects, or application of the statute may be tested in a prosecution for the violation of the statute. A party has no standing to enjoin the enforcement of a statute or ordinance absent a showing that his rights have been impinged or are imminently threatened by the statute.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bunch v. Britton
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.