¶1Such an 'injunction is neither by its precept nor by the practice of the Court, a returnable process; and the marshal is entitled to his fees for the service, without showing it to be returned, but is entitled to no fees for such return. A payment of the funds of the estate into the Court, without designating any part as paid for the use of the marshal or his deputy, would not be a payment to the plaintiff. The funds so returned would be, of course, distributed to the bankrupt’s creditors.
22 N.H. 216
Bryant v. Abbot
Superior Court of New Hampshire
Decided December 15, 1850
Superior Court of New Hampshire · decided 1850-12-15
Assumpsit, by a deputy marshal for the service and return of a writ of injunction, issued by the District Court of the United States, to stay proceedings in a suit commenced by a creditor of a bankrupt.
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 1861
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1850-12-15
View the full empirical analysis of this case →