22 N.J. Super. 24 - Moore v. Schultz’s Empirical Analysis
1952
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently September 2015
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on New Jersey Suburban Water Co. v. Town of Harrison · Saratoga State Waters Corp. v. . Pratt · 32 N.J. Eq. 248 - East Jersey Iron Co. v. Wright · 29 N.J. Eq. 228 - Silsby v. Trotter · Hopper v. Herring
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Quarry rights, mining rights, oil rights, and other similar rights relating to the severance of the physical substances of a servient tenement are normally more commonly interests a prendre appurtenant or in gross, or easements in gross.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“marl, loam, peat, sand, gravel, coal, and other minerals.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.