Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

22 N.M. 671

Rogers v. Crawford

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1917

New Mexico Supreme Court · decided 1917-05-19

Suit by A. J. Crawford against W. E. Rogers. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. ON MOTION FOR REHEARING. Amendment did not waive ruling on defenses to which demurrer ivas sustained. 1 A. & E. P. & P., 624; Ingham v. Dudley, Admr. 14 N.W. 82; 31 Cye. 746; Hagely v. Hugely, 9 Pae. 305; Eulsom v. Winch, 19 N. W. 305; Traveler’s Ins. Co. v. Redfield, 40 Pac. 185; Scott v. Halloek, 47 Pac. 968, Everything not contained in amended pleading is abandoned.

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently April 1929

4 state decisions

Relies on Bremen Mining & Milling Co. v. Bremen

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed · Decided 1917-05-19

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1OPINION OP THE COURT.

IiANNA, C. J.

¶2(after stating the facts as above).

¶3[1] The bill of exceptions having previously been stricken on motion, we have left for consideration but the first three assignments of error, which are predicated upon the court’s action in sustaining plaintiff’s demurrer to the defendant’s answer, and the three assignments of error complained of this action on the demurrer upon different grounds. We find, however, that the defendant after the demurrer was sustained filed an amended answer and later a second amended answer. For this reason, he has lost his right to be heard upon these matters in this court. It has been held that the filing of an amended pleading waives any error, other than jurisdictional, in sustaining a demurrer to the original pleading. 31 Cyc. 744; Bremen M. & M. Co. v. Bremen, 13 N. M. 111, 79 Pac. 806.

¶4For the reasons stated,, the judgment of the district court is affirmed, and it is so ordered.

Parker and Roberts, JJ., concur.
/22/nm/671 · .json · Public domain