Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

22 N.Y.3d 1161

433 Sutton Corp. v. Broder

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 1, 2014

New York Court of Appeals · decided 2014-04-01

Decided 2014-04-01

¶1OPINION OF THE COURT

¶2On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, with costs, order of Supreme Court, New York County, reinstated, and certified question answered in the negative. The Appellate Division erred in determining that defendant was the prevailing party. Accordingly, defendant is not entitled to attorneys’ fees.

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam.
/22/ny3d/1161 · .json · Public domain