¶1No opinion. Judgment and order reversed on the exceptions, and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event. Held : (1) That the court erred in receiving evidence of the declarations of the witness Buskey ; (2) that there was-no evidence that the plaintiff’s mortgage was fraudulent as against Buskey’» creditors, and the court improperly refused to charge the jury to that effect; (3) the court improperly refused to charge that the price agreed upon between the defendant and Buskey for keeping the mule was conclusive upon the defendant, and he could not claim a lien upon the mule for any greater sum for such keeping.
22 N.Y.S. 1114
Davis v. Bogart
Decided December 9, 1892
New York Supreme Court · decided 1892-12-09
<p>Action by Joseph H. Davis against George W. Bogart.</p>
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 1965
1 federal appellate ·
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1892-12-09
View the full empirical analysis of this case →