¶1Ro opinion. Judgment and order reversed on the exceptions, and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event. Held: (1) That the evidence as to the defendants being insured against loss by injuries to their employes, and the comments thereon by the counsel to the jury, were improper; (2) the evidence does n'ot sustain the alleged ground of negligence submitted to the jury.
22 N.Y.S. 1119
Wildrick v. Moore
Decided December 9, 1892
New York Supreme Court · decided 1892-12-09
<p>Action by Eugene J. Wildrick against John Moore and others.</p>
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 1959
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1892-12-09
View the full empirical analysis of this case →