22 Ohio App. 261 - Creager v. Creager’s Empirical Analysis
1926
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
March 1964
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We have the question of the conflict of jurisdiction squarely presented in this case. Upon full consideration, we are of opinion that the court of common pleas of Darke County, by the prior service of summons, obtained full jurisdiction of the action for. divorce and custody of the child, and that such court was not bound to yield jurisdiction to the court of common pleas of Lucas County upon the subject matter involved in the Darke County case. * * * ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.