Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 22 Ohio App. 2d 164 - Morgan v. Cole

22 Ohio App. 2d 164 - Morgan v. Cole’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 2011
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Smith v. Flesher · Farrington v. Gallaway · 155 Ohio St. 85 - Erdman v. Mestrovich · Pallini v. Dankowski · Cerny v. Domer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “{¶ 29} “The only time that error is grounds for the granting of a new trial is when the error is prejudicial to the moving party in a substantial way. * * * ‘In order for a party to secure relief from a judgment by way of new trial, he must not only show some error but must also show that such error was prejudicial.’ * * *””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.