22 Ohio App. 2d 187 - State v. Trantham’s Empirical Analysis
1969
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently July 2014
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 104 Ohio App. 289 - State v. Neff · 66 Ohio App. 30 - State v. Schroyer · 79 Ohio App. 340 - State v. Stewart
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“There is no formality or express terms by which venue must be proved, but it is mandatory it be proved beyond a reasonable doubt before a conviction can be sustained. State v. Dickerson , 77 Ohio St. 34 , 13 L.R.A. (N.S.) 341 , 122 Am. St. Rep. 479 , 1 Ann. Cas. 1181 ; State v. Schroyer , 66 Ohio App. 30 ; State v. Stewart , 79 Ohio App. 340 ; State v. Neff , 104 Ohio App. 289 , are cited to support the conclusion that the real test of whether venue has been proved beyond *Page 3 a reasonable doubt is that it must be determined from all the evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“no evidence that Perintown, the house, Siebert Apartments or U.S. Route 50 is in Clermont County or the state of Ohio.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the alleged crime was committed in a house next to Siebert Apartments in Perintown on U.S. Route 50”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.