22 Ohio App. 3d 25 - State v. Collier’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently December 2012
15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bordenkircher v. Hayes · 11 Ohio App. 3d 261 - State v. Burton · 14 Ohio App. 2d 218 - State v. Byrd
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Id. at paragraph two of the syllabus. The defendant in Collier was originally arrested for two counts of felony theft and one count of breaking and entering, but the breaking and entering charge was not pursued when the case went before the grand jury:”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“If the penalty, forfeiture, or punishment for any offense is reduced by a reenactment or amendment of a statute, the penalty, forfeiture, or punishment, if not already imposed, shall be imposed according to the statute as amended.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the reality of the ultimate goal of the `give-and-take' of plea bargaining justifies the prosecutor's persuasion by threat of another indictment[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.