Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 22 Ohio App. 3d 84 - Beck v. Jolliff

22 Ohio App. 3d 84 - Beck v. Jolliff’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
June 2022
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently June 2022

13 state decisions

7019841990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Trimble v. Gordon · Lalli v. Lalli · White v. Randolph · 51 Ohio App. 2d 21 - In Re Minor of Martin · Owens v. Humbert

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Clearly, the Ohio classification scheme is rationally related to the legitimate state purpose of assuring efficient disposition of property at death while avoiding spurious claims. Moreover, the Ohio provisions do not discriminate between legitimate and illegitimate children per se. All children may inherit from their mothers. Some illegitimate children and all legitimate children may inherit from their fathers. The group 'discriminated against' is that class of illegitimate children whose fathers did not formally acknowledge them or designate them as heirs-at-law, pursuant to R.C. 2105.18 or R.C. 2105.15.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.