Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 22 OHIOMISC2D 34 - State v. Alexander

State v. Alexander’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
6
states following
January 1997
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Mapp v. Ohio · Delaware v. Prouse · United States v. Brignoni-Ponce · United States v. Martinez-Fuerte

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he State is entitled in the interest of public safety to bring all available resources to bear, without having to spell out the exact efficiency coefficient of each component and of the separate effects of any particular component”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.