Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 22 OHIOST3D 120 - State v. Awan

State v. Awan’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

1,657
cited by 1,657 later decisions
1
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

1,653 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 1,657 later decisions — most recently March 2026 · most notably Goldfuss v. Davidson (1997), State v. Rogers (2015)

1,653 state decisions

572019861990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Fay v. Noia · Seasons Coal Co. v. City of Cleveland · C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co. · Douglas v. Alabama · Blackledge v. Perry

Cited together with State v. Thompkins · Strickland v. Washington · State v. Jenks · 20 Ohio App. 3d 172 - State v. Martin · State v. Dehass

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1,657 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he choice between credible witnesses and their conflicting testimony rests solely with the finder of fact and an appellate court may not substitute its own judgment for that of the finder of fact.”
    105 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Failure to raise at the trial court level the issue of the constitutionality of a statute or its application, which issue is apparent at the time of trial, constitutes a waiver of such issue and a deviation from this state's orderly procedure, and therefore need not be heard for the first time on appeal.”
    66 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “'an appellate court will not consider any error which counsel for a party complaining of the trial court's judgment could have called but did not call to the trial court's attention at a time when such error could have been avoided or corrected by the trial court.'”
    42 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.