Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 22 OHIOST3D 270 - State v. Delfino

State v. Delfino’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

78
cited by 78 later decisions
4
states following
October 2025
most recently cited

78 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 78 later decisions — most recently October 2025 · most notably State v. Gustafson (1996), Cunningham v. State (1989)

78 state decisions

44019861990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Ohio v. Johnson · Waller v. Florida · State v. Thomas · State v. Jones

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 78 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[P]ossession of a substance or substances in Schedule I or II, with the exception of marijuana, is a single and separate offense.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “{¶ 19} Possession of heroin and aggravated possession of drugs [fentanyl] are two separate offenses pursuant to R.C. 2925.11(C)(6) and (C)(1). Each possession offense required proof as to the specific drug involved and could not be supported by possession of a different controlled substance. * * * The possession of heroin or fentanyl will never support a conviction for possession of the other. The fact that the two controlled substances were found in the same baggie is of no consequence . (Emphasis added.) Id. at ¶ 35.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “No person shall knowingly obtain, posses^ or use a controlled substance”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.