Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 22 PACOMMW 582 - Commonwealth v. Grant

Commonwealth v. Grant’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
3
states following
March 2009
most recently cited

27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently March 2009 · most notably Woods v. State Civil Service Commission (2006), 183 W. Va. 364 - State Ex Rel. Ashley v. Civil Service Commission for Deputy Sheriffs of Kanawha County (1990)

27 state decisions

1501976198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Zeber Appeal · 2 Pa. Commw. 462 - Corder v. Civil Service Commission · Williams v. Civil Service Commission · Gibbs v. Civil Service Commission · 5 Pa. Commw. 139 - Kramer v. City of Bethlehem

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “For appellant to be dismissed, it was not necessary for him to be convicted of the crimes with which he was charged.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “No officer or employe of the Commonwealth shall discriminate against any person in recruitment, examination, appointment, training, promotion, retention or any other personnel action with respect to the classified service . . . because of race ... or other non-merit factors.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “(3) misconduct amounting to violation of law, rules or lawful and reasonable departmental orders; (5) scandalous or disgraceful conduct while on or off duty which may bring the service of the Commonwealth into disrepute; or (6) similar substantial reasons.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.