¶1We concur in the law of the case as ruled by the Judge below. Upon the facts we perceive no reason to be dissatisfied with the verdict of the Jury. The motion is dismissed.
22 S.C.L. 156
Hogg v. Martin
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided May 10, 1836
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · decided 1836-05-10
Tried before his Honor Judge Evans, Beaufort, Spring Term, 1835. On the 4th November, 1825, the plaintiff lodged with the late Judge Martin,^ a note of one James Hogg, to John Hogg, dated 13th February, 1821; whereon w,re endorsed divers credits, the last of which is dated in April, 1823, for #68. Toe note was for #200.
Decided 1836-05-10