State v. Tarlton’s Empirical Analysis
1908
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
April 1968
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Weinecke v. State · State v. Barrett · Wright v. State · People v. Kelly
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““While it is true that malice is an essential element of the offense of malicious mischief, the malicious intent may be inferred from the nature of the act and the circumstances of the case.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Audiss
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.