Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 22 SO2D 591 - Bacas v. Laswell

Bacas v. Laswell’s Empirical Analysis

1945

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
January 1965
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently January 1965

14 state decisions

80194519501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Oakes v. H. Weil Baking Co. · Massett v. Keff · Fontenelle v. Waguespack · Miller v. Meche · Bonneval v. American Coffee Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The doctrine is well established in this state that one who provokes a difficulty with another cannot recover damages for injuries inflicted upon him as a result thereof, even though the conduct of the one who inflicts the injuries was not justified in law. [Citations.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.