Caspelich v. Loew’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Madden v. Rhodes · 741 So. 2d 200 - Carrow v. Carrow · 740 So. 2d 915 - In Re Estate of Dabney · 753 So. 2d 1043 - In Re Estate of Grubbs · Dent v. Roberts
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] relation[ship] between two people in which one person is in a position to exercise a dominant influence upon the other because of the latter's dependency upon the former, arising either from weakness of mind or body, or through trust, the law does not hesitate to characterize such relationship as fiduciary in character. The dependency factor was emphasized again when we stated, "In determining whether or not a fiduciary or confidential relationship existed between two persons, we have looked to see if one person depends upon another."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.