Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 22 SW3D 331 - In Re Users System Services, Inc.

In Re Users System Services, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
3
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

24 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio))

Relationships

Relies on NCNB Texas National Bank v. Coker · Spears v. Fourth Court of Appeals · Rivercenter Associates v. Rivera · National Medical Enterprises, Inc. v. Godbey · Biggs v. United States Fire Insurance Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]echnical compliance with ethical rules might not foreclose disqualification, and by the same token, a violation of ethical rules might not require disqualification[;] however, the parties and the lower courts have all focused the issue of [disqualification] on Rule 4.02; hence so do we.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.