Moreno v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
June 2017
most recently cited
20 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Davis v. Alaska · United States v. Abel · Montgomery v. State · Guzman v. State · Colburn v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Evidence that a witness whom the State calls is subject to a criminal charge, or is on probation, can be used to show the bias or interest of the witness in helping the State”) (quoting Moreno v. State, 22 S.W.3d 482, 485-86 (Tex.Crim.App.1999)). . See Tex. Gov’t Code § 508.145(d) (”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Maxwell v. State · Woods v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.