Pearson v. Pearson’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

10 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Crestwood has accepted your offer of March 17th and considers both parties to be released from the lease for the Premises, effective March 24, 2005.” She does not indicate where this is located in the record. The judgment found that Crestwood accepted the offer with the language used in the opinion. This language is from the certified letter sent to Ms. Hilkene by Crestwood on March 18, 2005. 9 . All statutory references are to RSMo 2000 unless otherwise stated. 10 . All references to the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act are to RSMo Cum.Supp. 2003 unless otherwise stated. 11 . This provision is located in Article 3 of the Lease. 12 . This provision is located in Article 38.8 of the Lease. 13 . This provision is located in Article 38.10 of the Lease. 14 . Ms. Hilkene may be implying that her March 17, 2005, email was not an offer to terminate the contract because such an offer violated the cited provisions of the Lease or because the offer was not signed explicitly by her on behalf of Churchill. The only argument raised in the point relied on is that the parties did not agree to conduct transactions by electronic means. "Issues not encompassed by the point relied on and raised only in the argument portion of the brief are not preserved for review.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Crestwood Shops, L.L.C. v. Hilkene