Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 22 TC 1228 - Bartlett v. Commissioner

Bartlett v. Commissioner’s Empirical Analysis

1954

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
February 1996
most recently cited

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently February 1996 · most notably Gleis v. Commissioner (1955), Galant v. Commissioner (1956)

18019541960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cohan v. Commissioner · Lipsitz v. Commissioner · Potson v. Commissioner · D'Alise v. Commissioner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * when the increase in net worth is greater than that reported on a taxpayer's returns or is inconsistent with such books or records as are maintained by him, the net worth method is cogent evidence that there is unreported income or that the books and records are inadequate, inaccurate, or false. It is not correct to say that the use of the net worth method is forbidden where the taxpayer presents books from which income can be computed, for the net worth method itself may provide strong evidence that the books are unreliable. * * *”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “* * * Even where the taxpayer presents a set of books that appear superficially adequate, the application of the net worth method may show such a substantial variance with the reported income as to suggest the untrustworthiness of the books. * * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.