Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

22 Tex. 244

McKellar v. Lamkin

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1858

Texas Supreme Court · decided 1858-07-01

Error from Gonzales, Tried below before the Hen. Fielding Jones. Suit by defendant in error, against plaintiffs in error, upon a promissory note. One of the plaintiffs in error filed a motion, verified by oath, to quash the citation and service, because the citation served upon him required him to answer the petition of John L. McKellar. The copy of the citation alleged to have been served upon him, was filed with and asked to .he taken as a part of the motion.

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently March 1920

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1858-07-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Roberts, J.

¶1One of the defendants in error filed a plea in abatement, that he had not been served with a correct copy of the citation and copy of petition. Defendants below failing to appear when the cause was called, the court rendered judgment by default. It is contended, that, the plea having been filed, the court could not legally render a judgment by default.

¶2It was the duty of the defendant, who had filed the plea, to be present to have the issue submitted, and support it with affirmative proof. It was not the business of the court to do it for him. (Hopkins v. Donaho, 4 Tex. Rep. 336.)

¶3But the judgment is largely excessive, and must be reversed, and rendered for the correct amount.

¶4Reversed and reformed.

/22/tex/244 · .json · Public domain