Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

22 Tex. Ct. App. 679

Terry v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 22, 1887

Court of Appeals of Texas · decided 1887-01-22

<p>Appeal from the District Court of Trinity. Tried below before the Hon. H. G. Kittrell.</p> <p>This conviction was for disturbing the peace by going into the private house o£ Gideon Gibson, and using loud, vociferous, vulgar and obscene language, cursing and swearing, and displaying a knife therein. The penalty imposed by the jury was a fine of one dollar.</p> <p>The one witness who testified was the owner of the house, Gideon Gibson, and he established the fact that the defendant, though one of a number of guests attending a wedding at his private house, used violent, obscene and vulgar language, and flourished a knife in a threatening manner while in that house.</p> <p>The special charge refused by the court, and referred to in the first head note of this report, reads as follows:</p> <p>"Under an indictment charging a disturbance of the peace to have been committed in a private house, a defendant can not be convicted of disturbing the peace in a public place. When a private residence is thrown open to invited guests upon an occasion of a wedding, and a crowd is gathered at such private residence, during the time such crowd is assembled such residence is a public place.”</p> <p>The motion for new trial raised the questions discussed in the opinion.</p>

Decided 1887-01-22

Willson, Judge.

¶1It was not error for the court to refuse the special charge requested by the defendant. The fact that the private residence where the disturbance occurred was, at the time, a place where numerous persons had, upon invitation of the owner of the house, assembled on the occasion of a wedding, did not divest the residence of its private character, and deprive it of the protection afforded by the statute under which this conviction was obtained.

¶2There is no error in the charge of the court.

¶3In the statement of facts before us there is no evidence, either direct or circumstantial, that the offense was committed in the county of the prosecution, and for the want of proof of venue the judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded.

¶4 Reversed and remanded.

/22/texctapp/679 · .json · Public domain