Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 22 U.S. 241 - Kirk v. Smith ex dem. Penn

Kirk v. Smith ex dem. Penn’s Empirical Analysis

22 U.S. 241 · 1824

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
4
cited 4 times by the Supreme Court
16
states following
November 2010
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 3 district · 30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2010 · most notably Knox County v. Harshman (1890), Dent v. Ferguson (1889)

10 federal appellate · 3 district · 30 state decisions — followed in 16 states

8018241830184018501860187018801890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ricard v. Williams · Barr v. Gratz's heirs · Blight's v. Rochester · McClung v. Ross

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It would shock that sense of right which must be 'felt equally by legislators and judges, if a possession ¡which was .permissive, and entirely consistent with the title of another, should silently bar that title. • Several cases have been decided in this court in which the principle seems to have been considered as generally acknowledged; and in the state of Pennsylvania particularly it has been expressly recognized. _ To allow a different construction would be to make the statute of limitations a statute for the encouragement of fraud — a statute to enable one man to steal the title of another by professing to hold under it. No laws admit of such construction.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.