Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 22 Utah 2d 196 - Guinand v. Walton

22 Utah 2d 196 - Guinand v. Walton’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
April 2022
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently April 2022

17 state decisions

601969197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Zancanaro v. Cross · 6 Utah 2d 98 - Continental Bank and Trust Company v. Bybee · Stark v. Shaw · Barrett v. Vickers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Dear Mr. Guinand: This letter is to confirm your ownership of an undivided ten per cent (10%) interest in WALTON-KEARNS, a co-partnership composed of Paul T. Walton and Thomas F. Kearns. This interest includes and is not in addition to the various interests from time to time heretofore acquired by you. Upon termination of your employment with the partnership for any cause whatsoever your interest in the partnership will be determined and discharged as of said time without resulting in a dissolution of the partnership; and such interest as may have theretofore been vested in you in specific properties shall become your separate property, subject to adjustments incident to your proportionate share of the then partnership indebtedness. (Signed by the partners, Paul T. Walton and Thomas F. Kearns.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Both from the letter itself, and from the evidence, the only reasonable inference to be drawn was that the commitment of ten per cent (10%) of defendants’ property was an inducement in connection with the plaintiff’s work for the defendants. * * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “To satisfy the statute of frauds, '[alll that is required is that the interest be granted or declared by a writing subscribed by the party to be charged.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.