Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 22 Va. App. 368 - Reece v. Reece

22 Va. App. 368 - Reece v. Reece’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
6
states following
December 2015
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently December 2015

21 state decisions

100199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Antonelli v. Antonelli · 15 Va. App. 395 - Alphin v. Alphin · Edwards v. Lowry · 15 Va. App. 696 - Barnhill v. Brooks · 13 Va. App. 479 - Furr v. Furr

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the supporting spouse’s business ties to the community; (2) the supporting spouse's familial ties to the community; (3) whether the supporting spouse's relocation would have an undue deleterious effect upon his or her relationship with his or her children or other family members; (4) the length of time in which the supporting spouse has resided in the community; (5) monetary considerations which would impose an undue hardship upon the supporting spouse if he or she were forced to relocate; (6) the “quality of life" in the respective communities; (7) the geographic distance between the respective communities; and (8) the severity of the burden which a failure to relocate would have on the obligee spouse.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Aside from having to prove a material change in circumstances, husband had to prove that this change warranted a support modification. In discharging this burden, one of the circumstances that the chancellor must consider is whether the changed circumstances arose from his own voluntary underemployment. A trial court may use its broad discretion in deciding whether a material change in circumstances warrants a modification in the amount of support.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[W]e find no authority for a per se rule which would hold that a supporting spouse always becomes voluntarily underemployed or unemployed when he or she refuses to accept an offer of comparable employment in another geographic location.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.