Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 22 Va. App. 406 - Barnes v. Commonwealth

22 Va. App. 406 - Barnes v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
August 2011
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently August 2011

15 state decisions

90199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kotteakos v. United States · Richardson v. Marsh · Zafiro v. United States · United States v. Brugman · Tifford v. Wainwright

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “On motion of the Commonwealth, for good cause shown, the court shall order persons charged with participating in contemporaneous and related acts or occurrences or in a series of acts or occurrences constituting an offense or offenses, to be tried j ointly unless such j oint trial would constitute prejudice to a defendant. If the court finds that a joint trial would constitute prejudice to a defendant, the court shall order severance as to that defendant or provide such other relief justice requires.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[Prejudice requiring severance ... results only when “there is a serious risk that a joint trial would compromise a specific trial right of one of the defendants, or prevent the jury from making a reliable judgment about guilt or innocence .... The risk of prejudice will vary with the facts in each case,” and “the determination of the risk of prejudice ... [is left] to the sound discretion of the [trial] court.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.