22 Va. App. 557 - Theismann v. Theismann’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
62 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently May 2018 · most notably Jay v. Com. (2008), 24 Va. App. 123 - Mary Anne Rowe v. Charles S. Rowe (1997)
62 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 14 Va. App. 53 - Buchanan v. Buchanan · 10 Va. App. 728 - Srinivasan v. Srinivasan · Grant v. Zich · 3 Va. App. 337 - Woolley v. Woolley · 14 Va. App. 558 - Gamble v. Gamble
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“relevant to several of the factors in subsection (E), in particular Code § 20-107.3(E)(6) and (10), which require consideration of “[h]ow and when specific items of such marital property were acquired” and “[s]uch other factors as the court deems necessary or appropriate to consider in order to arrive at a fair and equitable monetary award.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the trial court did not commit reversible error.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jay v. Com.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.