Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 22 VAAPP 663 - Crawford v. Commonwealth

Crawford v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 1996
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 12 Va. App. 1003 - Lavinder v. Commonwealth · Williamson County v. Bondholder Committee · 10 Va. App. 430 - Willis v. Commonwealth · Cardwell v. Commonwealth · 9 Va. App. 304 - Lowery v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If there be any defect in form in any indictment, presentment or information, or if there shall appear to be any variance between the allegations therein and the evidence offered in proof thereof, the court may permit amendment of such indictment, presentment or information, at any time before the jury returns a verdict or the court finds the accused guilty or not guilty, provided the amendment does not change the nature or character of the offense charged. After any such amendment the accused shall be arraigned on the indictment, presentment or information as amended, and shall be allowed to plead anew thereto, if he so desires, and the trial shall proceed as if no amendment had been made; but if the court finds that such amendment operates as a surprise to the accused, he shall be entitled, upon request, to a continuance of the case for a reasonable time.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.