Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 22 Va. App. 82 - Brandon v. Commonwealth

22 Va. App. 82 - Brandon v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
November 2009
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Davis v. Alaska · Green v. United States · United States v. Jorn · Arizona v. Washington · National Union Fire Insurance v. Helfand

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “act arbitrarily or without good cause to believe that [declaring a mistrial] was necessary to prevent great injustice either to the Commonwealth or to the defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Double jeopardy protection is implicated even though the trial may have terminated without a verdict.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “shall be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.