Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

22 Vet. App. 70

Martin v. Peake

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · decided 2008-02-27

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently January 2008

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2008-02-27

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM:

¶2Before the Court is a February 15, 2008, joint motion by the parties to terminate the appeal of a March 6, 2006, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board) decision in which the Board denied an effective date earlier than February 1, 1998, for the payment of VA disability compensation for his service-connected glomerulonephritis, rated 30% disabling. Attached to the parties’ joint motion is a stipulated agreement in which the Secretary agrees to assign an effective date of July 1, 1967, for the payment of VA disability compensation for Mr. Martin’s service-connected glomerulo-nephritis, rated 30% disabling. The parties’ further agree that the appeal shall be terminated, with prejudice, as to any and all issues addresses by the March 2006 Board decision, following the execution of the stipulated agreement.

¶3Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

¶4ORDERED that the February 15, 2008, joint motion by the parties to terminate the appeal is granted and the appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice.

/22/vetapp/70 · .json · Public domain