Chezum v. Claypool’s Empirical Analysis
1900
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently July 1951 · most notably Peyton v. Peyton (1902), McCord v. McCord (1901)
2 federal appellate · 26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Northern Pacific & Puget Sound Shore Railroad v. Black · Seattle & Montana Railway Co. v. Johnson · Bokien v. State Insurance
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is enough to know that the proceeding afforded by the statute for vacating or modifying judgments is not a summary one, that its provisions are ample to enable justice to be done, and' that an appeal is allowed to this court from the order entered therein.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Nelson v. Denny
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.