22 Wash. App. 163 - Peterick v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
2 district · 64 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 71 later decisions — most recently January 2013 · most notably Folsom v. Burger King (1998), Folsom v. Burger King (1998)
2 district · 64 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Joseph Beers v. The State of Arkansas · 85 Wash. 2d 154 - LaPlante v. State · 83 Wash. 2d 491 - Morris v. McNicol · 62 Wash. 2d 195 - Balise v. Underwood · 86 Wash. 2d 145 - Seattle-First National Bank v. Tabert
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 71 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“after viewing all the pleadings, affidavits, depositions, admissions and all reasonable inferences drawn therefrom in favor of the nonmoving party”, the trial court finds,”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Had the legislature desired to include provisions stating that one in the same employ might be sued if he or she were (1) not engaged in work at the site of the injury; (2) officers or directors of the corporation involved who were not reported as employees; or (3) officers or directors of more than just the corporation involved, it could have done so. . . .”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“An action for relief not hereinbefore provided for, shall be commenced within two years after the cause of action shall have accrued.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.