Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 22 Wash. App. 640 - State v. Giebler

22 Wash. App. 640 - State v. Giebler’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
5
states following
April 2005
most recently cited

27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently April 2005 · most notably State v. Ford (1999), State v. Walsh (2001)

27 state decisions

1401979198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Santobello v. New York · 88 Wash. 2d 579 - State v. Tourtellotte · 13 Wash. App. 386 - State v. Bresolin · Stephan v. United States · 26 Cal. App. 3d 932 - People v. Barajas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The absence of the opportunity to cross-examine the named and frequently unnamed persons whose statements are included in the report does not prohibit its use by the sentencing judge. Nor is it improper for the sentencing judge to consider unsworn statements of a prosecuting witness at the sentencing hearing. The procedural requirements of due process are satisfied if the convicted felon is apprised of the facts and charges in the report, and is given the opportunity to rebut allegations therein, if those allegations are considered by the sentencing judge.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “an opportunity to demonstrate that the information relied upon is inaccurate or incomplete.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “undercuts the basis for the waiver of constitutional rights implicit in the plea.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.