Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 22 Wash. App. 674 - State v. Van Antwerp

22 Wash. App. 674 - State v. Van Antwerp’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
September 1993
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently September 1993

5 state decisions

30197919801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 641 (Livestock Fraud Protection Act)

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Morissette v. United States · Duvall v. United States · United States v. Jewell · United States v. Valle-Valdez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) Kinds of Culpability Defined. (b) Knowledge. A person knows or acts knowingly or with knowledge when: (i) he is aware of a fact, facts, or circumstances or result described by a statute defining an oifense; or (ii) he has information which would lead a reasonable man in the same situation to believe that facts exist which facts are described by a statute defining an oifense.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A person knows or acts knowingly or with knowledge when: (1) He is aware of a fact, facts or circumstances or result described by a statute defining an offense; or (2) He has information which would lead a reasonable person in the same situation to believe that facts exist, which facts are described by a statute defining a crime.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Fairness is the hallmark of constitutional due process.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.