Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 22 Wash. App. 851 - State v. Dickamore

22 Wash. App. 851 - State v. Dickamore’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
July 1998
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently July 1998

20 state decisions

100197919801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Sedillo v. United States · 73 Wash. 2d 271 - State v. Davis · Eugene Mason v. State of Arizona, A. E. Gomes, Superintendent, Arizona State Prison Atflorence · United States v. Kiffer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Services Other Than Counsel. Counsel for a defendant who is financially unable to obtain investigative, expert, or other services necessary to an adequate defense in his case may request them by a motion. Upon finding that the services are necessary and that the defendant is financially unable to obtain them, the court shall authorize counsel to obtain the services on behalf of the defendant."”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[S]o long as scientists disagree about the effect of marijuana, the legislature is free to adopt the opinions of those scientists who view marijuana as harmful. We will not substitute our judgment for that of the legislature where the statute in question bears a rational relationship to a legitimate legislative purpose.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “is no broader than his right to petition for state paid services under CrR 3.1(f).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.