Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 22 WIS2D 325 - Ide v. Wamser

Ide v. Wamser’s Empirical Analysis

1964

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
May 1994
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently May 1994

12 state decisions

601964197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pfeifer v. Standard Gateway Theater, Inc. · Kuklinski v. Dibelius · Vidakovic v. Campbell · Gumm v. Koepke

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The jury’s findings which have the approval of the trial court will not be disturbed if there is any credible evidence to support such findings.” Ide v. Wamser (1964), 22 Wis. 2d 325, 331 , 126 N. W. 2d 59 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““In the instant case, there was evidence from which the jury could infer that Wamser was proceeding too fast for the conditions which prevailed.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.