Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 220 Ala. 182 - Grayson v. Muckleroy

Grayson v. Muckleroy’s Empirical Analysis

1929

Citation profile

81
cited by 81 later decisions
2
states following
January 2018
most recently cited

79 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 81 later decisions — most recently January 2018 · most notably Penton v. Brown-Crummer Inv. Co. (1930), Lamar v. Lincoln Reserve Life Ins. Co. (1930)

79 state decisions

4101929193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kidd v. Borum · McArthur v. Carrie's Adm'r · Miles v. Caldwell · Crary v. . Goodman · Reeder v. Cox

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 81 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The purpose of the statute (as we said in Cheney, Trustee, v. Nathan, 110 Ala. 254 , 20 So. 99 [ 55 Am.St.Rep. 26 ]) is simply to fix 'the status of the land in respect to ownership, — to re-establish by decree muniments of title to it. Without the Miswer, to the case as made by- the bill, such a decree could never be rendered.” (Italics supplied.) And in Grayson v. Muckleroy, supra (page 219) : “The effect of the holding in that case is, though the bill avers more than the statute requires and sets up the complainant’s muniments of title, the defendant cannot on demurrer to the bill attack the complainant’s title, but must first avow and prove at least a prima facie title in himself.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““ * * * Proof of peaceable possession, actual or constructive, was necessary to sustain the equity of the bill, and in the absence of such proof the court was without jurisdiction to adjudicate and determine the title. * * * ” [Emphasis supplied.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.