Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 220 BR 525 - In Re Bakalis

In Re Bakalis’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
April 2019
most recently cited

1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently April 2019

1 district ·

140199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 345 · 11 U.S.C. § 363 · 11 U.S.C. § 704

Relies on Auerbach v. Bennett · Pollitz v. . Wabash R.R. Co. · In re Rock Industries Machinery Corp. · Treadway Companies, Inc. v. Care Corp. · Norlin Corporation v. Rooney Pace Inc J 2-10 Piezo Electric Products Inc

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “good faith”); In re Charlesbank Laundry Co., 37 B.R. 20, 22 (Bankr.D.Mass.1983) (stating that the sale must be”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Similarly in this case, Atlantic has made no showing that the activities of [Olympian] or its allies were “specifically directed” at controlling the sale price of the Olympian Bank shares or taking advantage of other bidders. It would seem far more likely that [Olympian] or its allies were driven by a desire to avert a takeover or to provide stability at Olympian Bank during the post-conversion period, a time of great uncertainty. To the extent, if any, that these activities affected the price of the bank shares or worked an advantage in favor of [Olympian], such outgrowth would be deemed by-products or unintended consequences and would not, under Gucci, implicate the good faith purchaser status of [Olympian].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “maximize the return to a bankruptcy estate,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.