220 Cal. Rptr. 3d 127 - Trejo v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 301 (Animal Drug Amendments of 1968) · 21 U.S.C. § 355 (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 379R (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) · 42 U.S.C. § 300A
Relies on Wyeth v. Levine · 20 Cal. 3d 413 - Barker v. Lull Engineering Co. · 8 Cal. 4th 548 - Soule v. General Motors Corp. · 26 Cal. 4th 465 - Merrill v. Navegar, Inc. · 44 Cal. 3d 1049 - Brown v. Superior Court
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[U]nder either a negligence or a strict liability theory of products liability, to recover from a manufacturer, a plaintiff must prove that a defect caused the injury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“defect in the product was due to negligence of the defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“failed to adequately warn of the potential risks.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.