Baker v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on People v. Arias · 30 Cal. 4th 1281 - Department of Rehabilitation v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · 41 Cal. 4th 704 - People v. Allegheny Casualty Co. · Everfield v. State Compensation Insurance Fund · 39 Cal. 2d 83 - Subsequent Injuries Fund v. Industrial Accident Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“' " ' [Citation.] If a statute is amenable to different interpretations, the interpretation that leads to the more reasonable result should be followed. [Citation.] We must construe the words of a statute in context, and harmonize the various parts of an enactment by considering the provision at issue in the context of the statutory framework as a whole.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“and construing them in context [citation].' [Citation.] If the language contains no ambiguity, we presume the Legislature meant what it said, and the plain meaning of the statute governs.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“We are guided by well-established rules of statutory construction. Our primary goal in construing a statute is to ascertain and effectuate the Legislature's intent. [Citation.] '”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.