State v. Genotti’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
77 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 77 later decisions — most recently June 2020 · most notably Gateway Co. v. DiNoia (1995), Lozada v. Warden, State Prison (1992)
77 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Washington v. Texas · Arizona v. Youngblood · Taylor v. Illinois · Middlesex County Sewerage Authority v. National Sea Clammers Ass'n · State v. Esposito
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 77 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“torture the words or sentence structure of a statute . . . to import an ambiguity where the ordinary meaning of the language leaves no room for it.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“The rules of statutory construction apply with equal force to Practice Book rules.... A basic tenet of statutory construction is that when a statute [or a rule of practice] is clear and unambiguous, there is no room for construction.... When we have occasion to construe rules of criminal procedure, they are to be strictly construed to protect the fundamental constitutional right to liberty.... State v. Genotti, 220 Conn. 796, 807 , 601 A.2d 1013 (1992).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““(1) Which the defendant intends to offer in evidence, except to the extent that it contains any communication of the defendant; or “(2) Which is a report or statement as to a physical or mental examination or scientific test or experiment made in connection with the particular case prepared by, and relating to the anticipated testimony of, a person whom the defendant intends to call as a witness.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Johnson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.