Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

220 F. 1006

Docket No. 2398.

Hull v. Dicks

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided February 22, 1915.)

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1915-02-22

<p>Petition to Superintend and Revise from the District Court of the United States for- the Southern District of Georgia; Emory Speer, Judge.</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 1928

1 federal appellate ·

1 counsel of record

Relies on Hull v. Dicks

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1915-02-22

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Petition to Superintend and Revise from the District Court of the United States for- the Southern District of Georgia; Emory Speer, Judge.

¶2William H., Barrett, of Augusta, Ga., for petitioner. B. B. McCowen, of Augusta, Ga., for respondent.

¶3Before PARDEE, Circuit Judge, and NEW-AIAN and MEEK, District Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5The following question, to wit: “Where a resident citizen of Georgia has been duly adjudicated a bankrupt and dies after such adjudication and after the appointment, qualification and partial administration of the trustee, is the estate vested in the trustee under section 70 of the Bankruptcy Law of 1898 (Act July 1, 1898, c. 541, 30 Stat, 565 [Comp. St. 1913, § 9654]), chargeable under section 8 of the same law, or. otherwise, with the allowance for a year’s support of the widow and minor children, as provided in the laws of Georgia ?’’^ — having been, certified to the Supreme Court, and having-been answered in the affirmative (235 U. S. 584, 35 Sup. Ct, 152, 59 L. Ed. —), and, the same being decisive, of this ease, the petition for revision is denied.

/220/f1d/1006 · .json · Public domain