Stanard v. Dayton’s Empirical Analysis
220 F. 441 · 1915
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 5 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 1938
4 federal appellate · 5 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Appellate journey
Relationships
Relies on Barton v. Barbour · Wiswall v. Sampson · Swarts v. Hammer · In re Prince & Walter · In re Eppstein
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Considering the plain provision in section 64a of the Bankruptcy Act of 1898 ( 30 Stat. 544 ), that ‘the court shall order the trustee to pay all taxes legally due and owing by the bankrupt * * * in advance of the payment of dividends to creditors,’ we entertain no doubt of the propriety of requiring that the certificate holders, who had paid the taxes and assessments at the sales, be reimbursed upon the cancellation of their certificates, or of requiring that the reimbursement be out of the general assets. The taxes and assessments were not merely charges upon the tracts that were sold, but against the general estate as well.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Rice v. Clemmons““Taxes accruing after bankruptcy proceedings are instituted are included among those to be paid. Swarts v. Hammer, 120 Fed. 256 , 56 C. C. A. 92 ; Id., 194 U. S. 441 , 24 Sup. Ct. 695 , 48 L. Ed. 1060 ; City of Waco v. Bryan, 127 Fed. 79 , 62 C. C. A. 79 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Rice v. Clemmons
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.