Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 220 F.2d 516 - Harrell v. United States

Harrell v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

220 F.2d 516 · 1955

Citation profile

57
cited by 57 later decisions
6
states following
March 1996
most recently cited

47 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 57 later decisions — most recently March 1996 · most notably State v. Moynahan (1973), State v. Reid (1984)

47 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

19019551960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1621

Relies on Allen v. United States · Reynolds v. States · Holt v. United States · Bollenbach v. United States · Coffin v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the admission of testimony taken at the former trial may introduce into the trial of the perjury charges highly prejudicial evidence tending to show the commission of other crimes.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.