Sisk v. Overlade’s Empirical Analysis
220 F.2d 68 · 1955
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2243 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Weeks v. United States · United States v. Rabinowitz · Price v. Johnston · Wolf v. People of the State of Colorado · Irvine v. People of State of California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * under decisions of the Indiana Supreme Court, where an arrest is valid, considerable latitude is given to search an automobile which the person arrested was using at the time of the arrest, or which the officers had reasonable cause to-believe had been used in the commission of a crime." Sisk v. Overlade, supra, 220 F.2d at page 72 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Sisk v. Lane““Accordingly, we have no hesitation in saying that were a State affirmatively to sanction such police incursion into privacy it would run counter to the guaranty of the Fourteenth Amendment.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Sisk v. Lane
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.