Robert N. Baker, Cross-Claimant — v. Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad Company, Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad Company v. Robert N. Baker, Cross-Claimant —’s Empirical Analysis
220 F.2d 721 · 1955
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
August 1966
most recently cited
6 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Ball v. T. J. Pardy Construction Co. · Minnehaha County v. Kelley · Mutual Ben. Health & Accident Ass'n v. Thomas · Een v. Consolidated Freightways · Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. Bowman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.